The Human as the Benchmark – Why People, Not Processes, Define Success

Posted by jwt on Thursday, October 24, 2024

The Final Step: Putting Humans at the Center

Throughout this series, we have explored why many software projects fail, how companies fall into the trap of business metrics that don’t measure real success, and why technology-first thinking leads to products that miss the mark.

Now, we arrive at the final and most important step: placing people—not technology, not processes—at the heart of software development.

For too long, companies have focused on efficiency, control, and internal optimization, assuming that well-structured workflows will naturally lead to great products. But no matter how streamlined your process is, if it doesn’t start and end with a deep understanding of the user, it will fail.


Connecting Value and Alignment

By deeply understanding the value their products deliver, companies don’t just solve the problem of misalignment—they establish a foundation for strategic clarity. Organizations that consistently focus on delivering value not only create better products but also earn customer trust and secure their long-term competitiveness.

In short: Know the value you create and make it the core of every decision. This is the only way to ensure that your software development remains relevant and successful.

The Problem Space Comes Before the Solution Space

Shifting focus toward people-centered innovation requires more than just a change in thinking—it demands significant effort and courage. Companies must be willing to break free from traditional business metrics that often reflect only superficial success patterns. People cannot be reduced to rigid KPIs. They operate in complex, dynamic contexts that require an exploratory and adaptive approach: understanding rather than controlling.

This shift in perspective goes beyond strategic adjustments and has direct implications for technological decision-making. Discussions about programming languages, frameworks, or databases—often central in development projects—become secondary in this context.

Understanding the Problem Space First

The problem space is defined by the needs and expectations of customers. A precise understanding of this space is the foundation for every subsequent development and decision-making process because it determines the direction and boundaries of possible solutions.

However, this understanding is not static—it is shaped by the complexity and ever-changing nature of human needs. An iterative approach, characterized by continuous questioning, exploration, and refinement, is essential to keep up with these shifts. Only when the problem space is thoroughly understood can companies accurately and effectively define the solution space.

Technology is the Answer—Not the Question

The solution space is not autonomous; it is entirely dictated by the requirements of the problem space and must adapt to its dynamics. Technological preferences or internal biases should never be the driving force behind decision-making.

A common mistake is to prematurely dive into abstract discussions about technologies, frameworks, or architectures while the problem space remains poorly understood. While these discussions may seem productive internally, they are often inefficient and risk missing actual user needs. Technology is not the starting point — it is the answer to a well-defined problem.

Therefore, companies must:

  • Resist the temptation to start with technology.
  • Validate the problem before implementing a solution.
  • Measure success based on adoption and usability, not internal development goals.
Explore Instead of Conclude

Understanding the problem space in which users operate is not a one-time milestone that can be fully captured in a workshop or a single analysis. Instead, it is a continuous, iterative process that requires ongoing questioning and reinterpretation.

Companies must be willing to explore this space not only at the beginning of a project but throughout the entire product lifecycle — constantly analyzing and redefining it.

A Long-Term Commitment

This approach requires patience and the courage to challenge established models and ways of thinking. However, the effort pays off: Companies that truly center their work around people create products and services that are not only relevant but also sustainably valuable — for both their customers and their organization.

The goal is not to impose excessive control but to establish a deep, lasting connection to customer needs and expectations. These connections are the key to long-term success and true innovation.


Final Thoughts: What Comes Next?

With this article, we conclude our deep dive into why software projects fail—and how they can succeed.

Key Takeaways from This Series:
  1. Misalignment is the root cause of failure – Companies prioritize internal goals over user needs.
  2. Business metrics don’t measure real success – Revenue and ROI don’t capture customer satisfaction.
  3. More efficiency and process optimization won’t fix bad products – A well-organized failure is still a failure.
  4. Technology should serve the user—not dictate the product – Value first, technology second.
  5. Understanding the problem space is more important than defining the solution space – Start with “why,” not “how.”
Your Next Steps:
  • Evaluate your own projects. Are they technology-first or customer-first?
  • Analyze your business metrics. Are they measuring internal performance or actual user success?
  • Talk to your customers. What do they really need? What frustrates them?
  • Implement iterative learning. How can you integrate continuous feedback into your product development?

Remember: Software development is not about writing code. It is about solving human problems. The best products are those that truly understand and serve their users. The question is: Are you ready to make that shift?


Thank You for Reading!

If you found this series insightful, feel free to share it with your network. Let’s build better products—together.